1.6‑Million‑Year‑Old Fossils Show Early Humans Repeated a Successful Meat‑Gathering Strategy
这是外语精读栏目。
At a fossil site in northern Kenya, certain bones keep turning up the same way — limbs missing from the same spots, surfaces marked with the same cuts, and long bones cracked open in nearly identical patterns.
The remains, dating back about 1.6 million years, come from the Koobi Fora Formation and show early humans weren’t simply eating what they found. They were returning to the same approach again and again by accessing carcasses early, selecting meat-rich limbs, and breaking bones open to extract marrow.
Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the study draws on more than 1,100 animal fossils from one of the earliest well-preserved sites from this time period and shows this pattern appears across sites spanning hundreds of thousands of years, pointing to a stable but flexible foraging strategy that may have helped early Homo adapt to changing environments.
Early Human Meat-Eating: What Fossil Bones Reveal About Hunting and Scavenging
The fossils come from a site known as FwJj 80, part of the Koobi Fora Formation. This layer predates better-known deposits in the region, and until recently, it had been far less studied, leaving an earlier period of human behavior less well understood.
Most of the remains are from antelope and other hoofed mammals, indicating that early humans repeatedly accessed similar prey.
Cut marks appear in locations associated with large muscle groups, especially along limb shafts, where most of the meat would have been concentrated. Broken bones show signs of deliberate strikes used to access marrow.
What stands out is the lack of competition. Carnivore tooth marks are rare, which suggests these carcasses were not heavily scavenged by other predators before humans arrived.
Researchers cannot say definitively whether early humans hunted these animals or displaced other predators. But the evidence points to the fact that they were consistently getting to food early enough to control how it was used.
Before studies like this, early human foraging was often described as something in flux, changing as conditions changed. What this evidence suggests is that it is more stable. Once this way of obtaining and processing meat was established, it seems to have persisted rather than being repeatedly reinvented.
How Early Humans Chose What Meat to Take and Where to Find It
The site also shows how early humans moved through their environment. Rather than transporting entire animals, they appear to have focused on specific parts to bring back, a choice that reflects more than convenience and points to an awareness of effort, distance, and reward.
The surrounding landscape likely shaped those decisions, as the site sits near what would have been a river margin, where animals gathered, and carcasses were more readily found. In a setting like this, the same conditions would have repeated over time, making it possible for the same kinds of choices to be made.
Did Early Humans Share Food?
If early humans were getting to carcasses early and using them fully, they were probably ending up with more food than one person could eat at once. The study notes that this kind of surplus may have created opportunities for food sharing, something often tied to cooperation.
When access to food becomes more predictable, behavior can start to change. Instead of reacting to whatever was available, early humans may have been able to rely on similar opportunities appearing in similar places, making repeated use of the same strategies.
That kind of consistency doesn’t just shape diet. It may also have influenced how groups moved and interacted, even if those patterns are difficult to trace directly in the fossil record.